During the first year of law school, students are reputed to undergo a
transformation in thought patterns—a transformation often referred to
as “learning to think like a lawyer.” Professors and students
accomplish this purported transformation, and professors assess it,
through classroom exchanges and examinations, through spoken and
written language. What message does the language of the law school
classroom convey? What does it mean to “think” like a lawyer? Is the
same message conveyed in different kinds of schools, and when it is
imparted by professors of color or by white women professors, and when
it is received by students of different races, genders, and
backgrounds? This study addresses these questions, using fine-grained
empirical research in eight different law schools.